Vaccine opinions

Scientists vaccine opinions

mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10514.

Abstract: COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved rapidly in response to the urgency created by the pandemic. No specific regulations existed at the time they were marketed.
The regulatory agencies therefore adapted them as a matter of urgency. Now that the pandemic emergency has passed, it is time to consider the safety issues associated with this rapid approval. The mode of action of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines should classify them as gene therapy products (GTPs), but they have been excluded by regulatory agencies.

Some of the tests they have undergone as vaccines have produced non-compliant results in terms of purity, quality and batch homogeneity.

The wide and persistent biodistribution of mRNAs and their protein products, incompletely studied due to their classification as vaccines, raises safety issues.

Post-marketing studies have shown that mRNA passes into breast milk and could have adverse effects on breast-fed babies. Long-term expression,
integration into the genome, transmission to the germline, passage into sperm, embryo/fetal and perinatal toxicity, genotoxicity and tumorigenicity should be studied in light of the adverse events reported in pharmacovigilance databases.

The potential horizontal transmission (i.e., shedding) should also have been assessed. In-depth vaccinovigilance should be carried out. We would expect these controls to be required for future mRNA vaccines developed outside the context of a pandemic.

Professor Christine Stabell Benn

Interview minute 9-12
We were so curious to find out when we heard about these two new vaccine types, to find out whether they would behave as live or non live vaccines, because we really didn’t have a clue.
They’re both both the mRNA vaccines and the adenovirus vector vaccines both new vaccine types and and we haven’t got any experience with their potential nonspecific effects.
So we haven’t got an idea whether there were nonspecific effects, whether they were beneficial or potentially harmful.
What we knew and pointed out right from the beginning was that it is a flaw in our system for testing vaccines. We don’t assess the effect of vaccines on all cause mortality, all cause morbidity. We don’t actually get a chance to assess whether they have nonspecific effects.
And it is beyond doubt now that vaccines have nonspecific effects. So it is really a a major flaw in the system.
What we are really worried about was the fact that the whole evaluation of the vaccines focused on the COVID specific effects.
Did the vaccine protects against it, protect against COVID but and and also that the clinical trials were abrogated all after two to four months when the vaccines got emergency approval.
So that means that we only had a very short term to follow up. To actually assess the the full effect of the vaccines both against COVID ….
But for the non specific effects this was a particular problem because nonspecific effects continue to occur months after you have received your vaccine and and we really didn’t have a chance because the randomized clinical trials, the phase three trials were abrogated with the vaccination of the control groups we didn’t have a chance to assess long term effects.
Robert Malone, Theo Schetters – mRna vaccins and the rise of the all-cause mortality rate.

August 2022 – This conversation with Theo Schetters and Robert Malone at “de nieuwe wereld” has been taken down by YouTube. They may not post anything for one week. a platform that brings together people from different disciplines to reflect on major changes that are coming due to a combination of rapid technological developments and globalization.
It is an initiative of philosopher Ad Verbrugge in collaboration with Marlies Dekkers, Jelle van Baardewijk and Willem de Witte.

Widespread Vaccine Failure is the Reproducibility Crisis in Public Health

Will They Adopt Science or Continue a Failing Denialist Agenda?
James Lyons-Weiler Feb 18, 2022

In my podcast, “Unbreaking Science”, my initial goal was to bring guests on who were willing to discuss the perils of continuing down a path on which data manipulation and other less egregious problems with observational studies as conducted in public health. The goal was not iconoclastic; rather, it was to help nudge Science into a position in which critical analysis of individual studies – and sets of studies if need be – was again considered normal and healthy – even if the consequence of that analysis was to draw vaccine safety into question.

The goal of science – understanding and discovery – are at complete odds with taboo against rational criticism of vaccines. Rational criticism is usually conducted via peer-review; however, CDC’s main publication outlet, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, is not peer-reviewed.

What has happened in the public health literature is an inversion of rational thought. Studies (like mine) that identify potential problems with vaccines are targeted for retraction. If Science is a way of knowing, then the quest of scientists should be the truth, that is, reality. The quest to have our knowledge match reality as closely as possible is not possible when the goal of those who claim they are conducting science is to prevent rational criticism at all costs – as if the vaccine science literature is thorough, complete, and finished, at least on the question of benefits and risks – and also as if each and every vaccine recommended by ACIP is the same entity year after year.

Peter McCullough, MD, MPH speaks at the 78th Annual Meeting of AAPS on October 2, 2021.

Winning the War Against Therapeutic Nihilism & Trusted Treatments vs Untested Novel Therapies
Dr Robert Malone The truth about the COVID mRNA Vaccines

Dr. Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines, while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988. His research was continued at Vical in 1989, where the first in-vivo mammalian experiments were designed by him. The mRNA, constructs, reagents were developed at the Salk institute and Vical by Dr. Malone. The initial patent disclosures were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. This work results in over 10 patents and numerous publications, yielding about 7000 citations for this work. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989.
Dr. Byram Bridle, University of Guelph

Alex talks with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph about a new peer-reviewed study that suggests there may be terrifying reasons side effects such as heart inflammation, VITT, and other serious issues may occur in those who have been vaccinated. 

Alex: you’ve been very, you know, very open on this whole issue, and you’re not anti vaccine by any stretch. But what do you think about this? Inflammation in the heart and is it an actual threat?”
Dr Bridle: I’m very much pro vaccine, but always making sure that the science is done properly and that we follow the science carefully before going into public rollout of vaccines. – I’ll forewarn you and your listeners that the story I’m about to tell is a bit of a scary one.

The corona virus has a spike protein on its surface. That spike protein allows to infect our bodies. That is why we’ve been using the spike protein in our vaccines. The vaccines we’re using get the cells in our body to manufacture that protein.
If we can mount immune response against that protein, in theory we can prevent this virus from infecting the body. That’s the theory behind the vaccine, however, when studying the disease severe COVID-19, everything that you described earlier, heart problems, lots of problems with cardiovascular system, bleeding and clotting is also related with severe COVID-19.

What has been discovered by scientific community is the spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage the cardiovascular system. 

If you inject the purified spike protein into the blood of research animals, they get all kinds of damage the cardiovascular system, it can cross the blood brain barrier and cause damage to the brain. Now at first glance, that doesn’t seem too concerning because we’re injecting these vaccines into the shoulder muscle. The assumption until now has been that these vaccines behave like all of our traditional vaccines; that they don’t go anywhere, they stay in our shoulder. Some of the protein will go to the local draining lymph node in order to activate the immune system.

However, this is where the cutting edge science has come in, and this is where it gets scary. Through a request for information from the Japanese Regulatory agency, myself and several international collaborators we have been able to get access to what’s called the Bio-distribution study. It’s the first time ever that scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA vaccines go after vaccination.
Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is absolutely not, It’s very disconcerting.

The spike protein gets into the blood, circulates through the blood post-vaccination for several days, it accumulates in the blood, and accumulates in a number of tissues, such as the spleen, bone marrow, the liver, the adrenal gland and of particular concern for me is it accumulates in the ovaries, in quite high concentrations.

Another scientific paper just accepted for publication about 13 young health care workers that received the Moderna vaccine, confirmed that they found the spike protein in circulation in 11 of them. 

What this means is: we have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein. It is a toxin that can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation. Now we have clear cut evidence that when in circulation, the spike protein can do one of two things that can either cause platelets to clump that can lead to clotting. That’s exactly why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with these vaccines. That’s why we’re seeing heart problems. The protein can also cross the blood brain barrier and cause neurological damage.

The following has not yet been accepted for publication:
They were trying to show that the antibodies from the vaccine get transferred through breast milk and the idea was this may be a good thing, ’cause it would confer some passive protection to babies. However, what they found inadvertently was that the vaccines actually get transferred through the birth breast milk; the vaccine vector itself. Any proteins in the blood will get concentrated in breast milk. Looking into the adverse event database in the United States, we have found evidence of suckling infants experiencing bleeding disorders in the gastrointestinal tract. This has implications for blood donation right now. We don’t want transfer of these pathogenic spike proteins to fragile patients being transfused with that blood.

We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen, we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin. By vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.

I have many other legitimate questions about the long term safety.

Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients

SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine. 11 of 13 participants showed detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein as early as day one after first vaccine injection. Clearance of detectable SARS-CoV-2 protein correlated with production of IgG and IgA.

Lipid nanoparticles are designed to be widespread throughout the body.

These vaccines and or the spike proteins can cross the blood brain barrier and get into the Brain. Adverse events related to the vaccine seemed to be similar to severe COVID-19; damage to the heart, damage to blood vessels, clotting, bleeding, and neurological issues.

People have to understand the history behind these lipid nanoparticles, these little bubbles of fat we put these messenger RNA’s into. People don’t realize these were never designed for vaccine use. They were designed for gene therapy, not for vaccine use.

They were designed to serve gene therapy and for drug delivery systems. They actually wanted widespread distribution; designed to be widespread throughout the body.

Fast COVID-19 vaccine timelines are unrealistic and put the integrity of scientists at risk

June 17, 2020 Byram W. BridleUniversity of Guelph and Shayan SharifUniversity of Guelph

We are academic scientists who manage vaccine research programs. In fact, Dr. Bridle received COVID-19-focused funding to develop a novel vaccine platform. Although many of us are working hard towards developing vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, we worry that some in the scientific community have offered too much hope for this to be accomplished in a timely fashion. Sometimes these promises are used by politicians and governments to inform public policies. As a result, the integrity of the scientific community is now in the limelight and, arguably, at risk.

Lessons from SARS and MERS
Educators often rely on past performance to predict the future performance of students. In this respect, how was the performance of the scientific community in the wake of the original SARS-CoV, or Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV? The fact is, no vaccine against a coronavirus has successfully navigated the rigours of clinical testing, despite having up to 17 years to do so.

The same applies to other dangerous respiratory pathogens, such as respiratory syncytial virus. Whether enough has been learned from these past experiences to get the design of COVID-19 vaccines right remains to be seen, and still does not negate the need for a rigorous testing process that will take time.

One concern is that some vaccines can protect against disease (that is, the outcome of an infection) but not against infection (the ability of the virus to get into the body). In this scenario, vaccinated individuals could potentially become asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2, thereby spreading COVID-19. For this and many other reasons, a cautious approach must be taken to developing COVID-19 vaccines. (This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.)

Dr Byram Bridle – I would probably prefer to have natural immunity

I’m a viral immunologist. That means I have expertise in the fields of virology and immunology.

I do have a COVID-19 vaccine development program going on. And the vaccines that we’re developing realistically wouldn’t be able to go into human clinical trials for at least another year and a half, maybe two years.

But I want to highlight that vaccine hesitancy is very, very different. And a lot of people who have the vaccine hesitancy are being made to feel very bad these days, right? It’s as though if they were simply educated enough about vaccines, then they would have no problem with these COVID-19 vaccines. But that’s not the case. That’s not the definition, certainly that I use. These are individuals instead who are unsure of their commitment to taking a vaccine. And it’s usually because of outstanding questions. So in other words, the onus is not on the individual. It’s not that the individual simply needs to be educated. We have, there’s lots of people who are very deep thinkers about this, doing their own research about the COVID-19 vaccines and coming up with very legitimate questions.

I would argue the onus is on the manufacturers and the health regulatory agencies and our governments to provide answers to these legitimate questions that many people have.

So as a consequence, I view it as my personal responsibility to highlight what these outstanding questions are for people and to do my best to provide fact-based assessments of their potential implications.

Dr Jane Ruby – Myocarditis caused by mRNA coded spike protein injection

Myocarditis is an inflammation, it is an infection of the heart. It has long term complications for congestive heart failure and it is at the root of the cause of many blood clots and bleeding.

The CDC has been saying “It’s just a few cases and they’re looking into it” Well, they’ve known about this since Israel started reporting it in the middle of April. It’s more than a few cases. Israel reports that originally they thought it was about one in 50,000. It’s mostly young people and it’s now about 1700 cases. In Israel, per 50,000 that comes out to about one in 2500 and in the world of medicine, that’s a big number.

The bombshell that I want everybody to know, is that the FDA and the CDC and anybody else who’s paying attention to the literature knew on December 21st, 2020 that the spike proteins are responsible for cardiac damage.

We have scientific proof that it is dangerous for anyone who’s had the natural COVID infection to get these vaccines.

Did Pfizer Fail to Perform industry Standard Animal Testing Prior to Initiation of mRNA Clinical Trials?
The Many Ways in Which COVID Vaccines May Harm Your Health

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

COVID-19 vaccines are capable of causing damage in a number of different ways. Disturbingly, all these different mechanisms of harm have synergistic effects when it comes to dysregulating your innate and adaptive immune systems and activating latent viruses.

The worst symptoms of COVID-19 are created by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and that is the very thing gene-based COVID vaccines are instructing your body to make

While the natural spike protein is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is even worse, as the synthetic RNA has been manipulated in such a way as to create a very robust and unnatural spike protein

The spike protein is toxic in and of itself, and has the ability to induce vascular, heart and neurological damage

The COVID-19 vaccine disables the Type I interferon pathway, which explains why vaccinated patients are reporting herpes and shingles infection following COVID-19 vaccination.

Is a Coronavirus Vaccine a Ticking Time Bomb?

Dr Doug Corrigan. – Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, a master’s in Engineering Physics (concentration: Solid State Physics), and a bachelor’s in Engineering Physics (concentration: electrical engineering.)

Will a vaccine to SARS-CoV-2 actually make the problem worse? Although not a certainty, all of the current data says that this prospect is a real possibility that needs to be paid careful attention to. If you stay with me, I’ll explain why.

Prof. Dr Dolores Cahill Molecular Biologist, Immunologist

Immune system can save everyone from Covid-19; No one needs to die from Covid-19, flu symptoms can be avoided and the new mRNA vaccines are deadly.

So says molecular biologist and immunologist, Ph.D. Dolores Cahill, for Update, which we met at an event in Copenhagen, organized by the World Freedom Alliance.

Cahill is an international expert on the immune system and vaccines and has decades of research behind him.

In parallel, she has held a number of international top positions for e.g. for the European Commission. She tells in the interview which vitamins, minerals and preparations can save everyone from dying of Covid-19, reduce flu symptoms and provide security for the elderly with poor health.

Her warnings against the new mRNA vaccines cannot be overstated.

She would rather go to jail than be vaccinated with them, and if someone – against her will – gave her an injection, she would prosecute them for attempted murder.

Prior to May 2020, there were no approved mRNA vaccines, due to high mortality rates in the trials that may occur months or years after vaccination. According to Cahill, doctors, politicians and big-tech should be held directly and criminally accountable when they dissuade the population from vital information, prevention and proper treatment.

Interview on
mRNA vaccines dangers – Dolores Cahill and Alexandra Henrion-Caude

Prof. Dr Dolores Cahill Molecular Biologist, Immunologist

Alexandra Henrion-Caude, biomedical researcher.Patents for bioinformatic tool in microRNA field: MIRIFIX. Grantee, European, Inserm, French and Canada Association, 2001-2010.

Video starting at 8m:35s -Alexandra Henrion-Caude

The informed consent to be disclosed to any vaccine trial subjects, which is in fact any person who is currently being vaccinated. The risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease.

Especially given the response of the Th2 lymphocytes, a specific response that can take place in elderly! It is highly expected that elderly people will be more at risk actually of all the procedures

The conclusion leaves no place for interpretation! It is an ethical aspect that we should be raising!  The specific and significant COVID19 vaccine risk of ADE (antibody dependent enhancement).

It should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval in order to meet the medical ethics standards of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Professor Dr Dolores Cahill Why people will start dying a few months after the 1st mRNA vaccinations

Professor Dr Dolores Cahill Explains “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus”

Acces the report on the NIH website via this link or download the saved copy below

Dr Wolfgang Wodarg Dec 3, 2020 – Concerns over the health and safety

Concerns over the health and safety of the human test subjects in Pfizer’s European COVID vaccine study have caused two eminent doctors to launch a petition calling for an immediate halt to those studies.

Fragment from

On December 1, 2020, Dr. Michael Yeadon, an ex chief of research at Pfizer and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a lung specialist and former department head of public health lodged an appeal to the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for approving drugs across the EU, asking them to suspend the ongoing Pfizer/BioNtech COVID vaccine study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Mike Yeadon No need for vaccines, ‘the pandemic is effectively over’

Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, states that the drive for a universal vaccine has ‘the whiff of evil’ which he ‘will oppose … vigorously.’

There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler | PA Medical Freedom Press Conference

PA Medical Freedom Press Conference 10/20/20 – Opposing Covid vaccine mandates and medical care discrimination.

Research scientist James Lyons – Weiler, PhD, is President and CEO of The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge , Founder of, and the author of “Cures vs. Profits“, “Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism“, and “Ebola:An Evolving Story” Dr. Lyons-

Weiler has been conducting biomedical research for over 20 years and has 58 peer-reviewed publications.

After earning a PhD in Ecology, Evolution & Conservation in Biology, he won an AP Sloan Postdoctoral Fellowship in Computational Molecular Biology at Pennsylvania State University.

Prior to founding IPAK and IPAK-EDU, he was a full faculty member at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, faculty in the Department of Pathology in the School and Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, and Senior Research Scientist/Scientific Director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Bioinformatics Analysis Core in support of translational research, systems biology, sequence analysis, and the creation of novel algorithmic solutions for the analysis of complex and challenging data.

original on this channel
Prof. Francis Boyle -Do Not Take These Frankenshots!

Prof Boyle has some very strong statements about the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccine.

Prof Boyle drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the US Congress and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush.

I deliberately copied the above from his CV since he is drawing a direct parallel with the vaccination of US soldiers serving in the 1st Gulf war. He calls this war-crimes breaking the Nuremberg code with experiments on the vaccines for these soldiers. 500.000 troops inoculated, 11.000 were killed and 100,000 were disabled and those were healthy young men and women in US armed forces

Those experimental vaccines have been approved under the same emergency approval procedure as the COVID-19 vaccine.

Further more he states that COVID19 is an offensive biological warfare weapon Biosafety Level 4 laboratory (BSL-4) from which he believes the infectious disease escaped. Which is China’s equivalent to Fort Detrick and they have to wear moon suits and portable air supplies showing dangerous it is in these facilities. COVID-19 was developed not only at the Wuhan BSL 4 but also at the University of North Carolina bio safety Level 3 land. Doctor Shi Zhengli, the black Queen from Wuhan BSL 4 took a synthetic recombinant virus using synthetic biology making it more lethal and more infectious.

Prof Boyle is not the only scientist talking about a laboratory as the origin for the covid-19 virus. Prof. Luc Montagnier “Virus is Manipulated. A very Meticulous job”
Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen “I firmly believe that it was spread by accident. When US authorities conducted an inspection in Wuhan in 2018, it was described as a risk lab.
More details on the main blog

The text below copied from Youtube. I saved the video because I don’t believe it will last long on Youtube.

Prof Boyle talks to Jason Liosatos warning us not to take to the Frankenshots and explains why
Support Jason’s work here
See my previous talks with Prof. Francis Boyle this year here:
Feb 2020…
March 2020…
April 2020…
Jason’s book and website:
See all Jason’s shows here
Jason’s online art classes

Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (Germany)
Interview with Laura Ingraham

December 2, 2020 – LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): Doctor, on the issue of the vaccine, tonight, Anthony Fauci, on this network, actually said that 75 percent of Americans are going to have to get vaccinated to reach what they call “herd immunity”. Do you — do you buy that?

DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI (GUEST): What utter nonsense. I know that Dr. Fauci is a renowned
HOST: —immunologist.

GUEST: medical scientist and immunologist. But what he says has to be wrong. And this is also what we have taken great lengths to explain in the book. And why — you know, someone who says this, has not the slightest inkling of the basics of immunology. And this is very, very surprising for someone of Dr. Fauci’s standing. And I would dare to defy him anywhere in the world at any time. But I cannot do this in 2 minutes.

INGRAHAM: Well, so you believe that the COVID vaccine is not necessary?
BHAKDI: I think it’s downright dangerous. And I warn you, if you go along these lines, you are going to go to your doom. And it’s so, so unnecessary.

Then the video ends abrupt because they don’t have more time ….

Book review in PDF form

Sucharit Bhakdi Warns Against Hastily Created Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine (video)

In the following RAIR Foundation USA exclusively-translated video, German virologist Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi expresses deep suspicion of the vaccination development process in place for the Chinese coronavirus, which violates well-established scientific norms. The Doctor makes several very powerful points that should be considered by those touting a potential vaccine.
Open Letter from Doctors Scientists Regarding Covid Vaccine Safety

28 February 2021
Dear Sirs/Mesdames,


As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.

We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.

In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Prof. Dr. Pierre Capel – Frikandel 3.0

Unfortunately this video is in the Dutch language without sub-titles
More from Professor emeritus FOR THE JOY OF SCIENCE